Probability theory as a project management tool: bayesian methodology for decision-making

Main Article Content

Natalia Piddubna

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of inefficient project parameter updating through development of an adaptive decision-making system based on Bayesian theory. Traditional planning methods rely on static estimates that are not systematically adjusted as new data emerges, leading to accumulation of deviations between planned and actual indicators. Analysis of contemporary research demonstrates that Bayesian methods remain predominantly theoretical constructs without sufficient operationalization for project practice. A methodological system has been developed that integrates Bayesian updating into four domains: dynamic risk assessment, adaptive schedule forecasting, quality control optimization, and flexible resource management. The implementation algorithm is structured as a five-stage process from identifying application areas through probabilistic model formation to organizational training. Empirical verification was conducted on a construction facility worth twenty-five million euros, where three Bayesian applications were tested. Meteorological risk assessment reduced the probability of critical delays from twenty-five to seven percent, releasing three hundred thousand euros in reserves. Integration of daily productivity metrics over twenty working days reduced forecast uncertainty from eight to three days, demonstrating a sixty-five percent accuracy improvement. Sequential subcontractor evaluation raised confidence levels from seventy to ninety-five percent, justifying reduction in reserve funds. Synthetic analysis of three updates supported the decision for accelerated facility commissioning with expected value of one hundred nineteen thousand euros at seventy percent success probability. Identified limitations include: dependence on initial assumption accuracy, mathematical barriers for users, operational burden of data collection, misalignment between model assumptions and actual interdependencies. Construction of integrated Bayesian architectures with multilevel parameter linkages has been identified as a prospective direction. Theoretical contribution lies in specification of Bayesian apparatus for project conditions with high dynamics. Applied significance is determined by improved assessment accuracy and substantiation of managerial decisions in infrastructure projects with significant financial risks.

Article Details

How to Cite
Piddubna, N. (2026). Probability theory as a project management tool: bayesian methodology for decision-making. Herald of the Odessa National Maritime University, (78), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.47049/2226-1893-2025-4-193-216
Section
Project and program management
Author Biography

Natalia Piddubna, Odesa National Maritime University, Odesa, Ukraine

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Logistics Systems and Project Management

References

1. Project Management Institute. (2021). Pulse of the Profession 2021: Beyond Agility. PMI Global Survey.
2. Bushuyev, S.D., & Bushueva, N.S. (2018). Mekhanizmy formuvannia tsinnosti v diialnosti proektno-kerovanykh orhanizatsii [Mechanisms of value formation in project-managed organizations activities]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system – Management of Development of Complex Systems, 36, Р. 25-32 [in Ukrainian].
3. Bushuyev, S.D., Kozyr, B.Yu., & Zaprivodi, A.V. (2019). Neliniine stratehichne upravlinnia infrastrukturnymy prohramamy [Nonlinear strategic management of infrastructure programs]. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 4(10), Р. 14-23. DOI: 10.30837/2522-9818.2019.10.014 [in Ukrainian].
4. Bushuyev, S.D., Bushuiev, D.A., & Kozyr, B.Yu. (2020). Rozvytok mozhlyvostei upravlinnia proektamy prohramy infrastruktury. Chornobylskyi vypadok [Development of project management capabilities for infrastructure programs. Chornobyl case]. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 2(8), Р. 31-39 [in Ukrainian].
5. Bushuyev, S., & Ivko, A. (2024). Project management models for develop- ment projects in self-managed organizations in a syncretic context. Bulletin of NTU «KhPI». Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management, 1(8), Р. 23-28.
6. Bushuyev, S., Bushuiev, D., & Bushuieva, V. (2020). Project management during infodemic of the COVID-19 pandemic. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 2(12), 13-21. DOI: 10.30837/2522-9818.2020.12.013.
7. Teslia, Yu.M., & Latysheva, T.V. (2019). Kilkisni metody otsiniuvannia ryzykiv u proektnomu menedzhmenti [Quantitative methods for risk assessment in project management]. Visnyk NTU «KhPI» – Bulletin of NTU "KhPI", 2(1327), Р. 60-67 [in Ukrainian].
8. Hubbard, D.W. (2014). How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
9. Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (2011). How to Manage Project Opportunity and Risk: Why Uncertainty Management Can Be a Much Better Approach than Risk Management (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
10. Williams, T.M. (2003). The contribution of mathematical modelling to the practice of project management. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 14(1), Р. 3-30.
11. Khodakarami, V., Fenton, N., & Neil, M. (2007). Project scheduling: impro- ved approach to incorporate uncertainty using Bayesian networks. Project Management Journal, 38(2), Р. 39-49. DOI: 10.1177/875697280703800205.
12. Kim, S.Y., Van Tuan, N., & Ogunlana, S.O. (2009). Quantifying schedule risk in construction projects using Bayesian belief networks. International Journal of Project Management, 27(1), Р. 39-50.
13. Ballesteros-Pérez, P., del Campo-Hitschfeld, M.L., González-Naranjo, M.A., & González-Cruz, M. C. (2015). Climate and construction delays: Case study in Chile. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(6), Р. 596-621.
14. Fenton, N., & Neil, M. (2018). Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
15. Vanhoucke, M. (2012). Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling: Baseline Scheduling, Risk Analysis and Project Control (2nd ed.). Springer.
16. An, Y., Huang, X., & Zhang, L. (2020). An approach based on Bayesian network for improving project management maturity: An application to reduce cost overrun risks in engineering projects. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 142, 106341. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106341.